Showing posts with label Mosque. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mosque. Show all posts

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Do we need to build any more Temples?

Recently I read an article about a plan for the construction of a huge Vedik temple by ISKON at Mayapur in India. This temple is supposed to cost around 75 million USD, this is a huge amount of money as far as a country like India is concerned. Spending such a huge amount of money just for the construction of a temple is like a cruel joke on all who could benefit from all this money if it's spent for some relevant social cause. I also see a lot of photos of many temples, churches, or other religious centers which are constructed using very expensive materials, and decorated with precious metals like gold and silver. A lot of material and money is wasted to build and decorate them, they really look like grand and lavish displays of wealth, very often thought comes to my mind why can't this money be used to build other things that can be more useful to people? After I started writing this post there was huge controversy in the media when Mr. Modi said, "Pehle shouchalaya phir Devalay" (build toilets first then temples), a similar statement was made by Mr. Jairam Ramesh a few years back and then also it generated a lot of controversy for some different reason. So the question is, do we need any more lavish temples (I am using the temple as a general term for all religious centers like Mosque, Church, etc.) when people don't have access to some basic facility like a school, hospital, or a toilet?

I personally believe that we have enough religious monuments for all religions all over the world. One can find a temple, mosque, synagogue, church, or something equivalent in almost all major cities of the world, we don't need to build any more of these. Many people visit these places and some of them are big tourist attractions which attract millions of visitors every year. All the money from tourism is not reinvested in the community but it stays with that temple or private entities. The question is, in a country like India where many are living without home, proper medical care, food or education should any organization spend such an enormous amount of money to build a religious monument that will be just a tourist attraction? Can't they use this money to do something better, more useful thing, something like a hospital or a free school or college for the underprivileged or even toilets? On one side we all say that God is everywhere but then keep on building huge, expensive, and lavish structures just to host their images or for social gatherings (like prayers, etc.). Many religious institutions spend enormous amounts of money to build and maintain these buildings instead of helping people who are struggling for their basic needs. I am sure their God would love them more, and bless them more if they used this money for people's welfare instead of building another temple, Church, or any other religious monument.

Religion is a personal as well as social need for many and there are already many centers that can satisfy this need. If a temple serves as a place for social gatherings, to give shelter to the homeless, or to provide food and education for the underprivileged then it's a good thing. Some religious institutes do these things but to do such work I don't think we need any fancy structures with expensive decorations. One can build a simple structure and use all that extra money for some better social activity. A country like India needs more toilets than temples or churches, even though this thought was expressed by major political leaders from two big national parties of India, there are very few takers for this idea. Still, the construction of a temple or Mosque is considered more important than the construction of basic facilities like toilets. Isn't it ironic that in a country that hosts one of the richest temples in the world, many people still don't have access to basic facilities like toilets? Some of these religious institutes are so rich that if they want they can do wonders for society with all the money they have, but they behave just like big corporates, exclusively protecting their own interest without any real real social agenda. I think with all the problems our society is facing these institutes should put all their plans for the construction of Mosque, Church, or temples on hold, rather they should spend all that money on some social causes like building more medical care facilities, distributing medicines to poor, offer free education to needy, sanitation facilities (like toilets, especially for women), etc. There is a tremendous need for funds in all these areas and these institutes can play a very big role in funding such infrastructure projects. I hope they all think about this idea and give it serious consideration. One more temple, mosque, or church may not change anyone's life but one more school or hospital might change and save the lives of millions of people. Even a public toilet can make life easy for many and I believe doing this is no less than offering prayer to any god.

Thanks for reading and please share your views on this topic.

[Copyright: Vinay Thakur. Please contact the author for re-posting or publishing]

Links:

Sunday, August 4, 2013

Mosque wall and the statue of Shivaji

I read these two news articles on the same day, first was the report of the suspension of IAS officer Durga Shakti Nagpal by the UP government to avoid communal tension after she ordered to demolition of the wall of an illegally under-construction mosque, and the other news was about objection on removal of statue of Shivaji Maharaj from entrance of one new museum in Pune. In both cases the officers responsible for the maintenance of law and order acted to remove unauthorized structures, I believe that both acted according to present law and there was no other intention behind these actions. In the first case, the officer became a hero for acting according to the law and not bowing to political pressure but in the second case police officers who ordered the removal of that statue are treated like villains. Religion plays playing a huge part in both cases. Depending on their faith people react differently if an illegally constructed temple is demolished instead of a mosque and vice versa. There are people who support the destruction tomb of Afjal Khan (a Mugal officer who was killed by Shivaji), but the same people are against the removal of an unauthorized Shivaji statue. Ironically, the tomb that they want to destroy was built by Shivaji himself. This is an ideal example of a double standard and hypocritical behavior by people who want to bring religion, especially Hindu-Muslim conflict, in each and every issue (as it polarizes people which in turn brings a lot of media attention).

Both these actions are actually very routine incidents that happen every day as regular administrative processes. Demolition of illegal structures is not a new thing, but it always creates a lot of controversy if some religious structure is involved. Most people switch off their common sense and logical thinking when they deal with religion and politics. Both these institutions love to control people's minds and people oblige in large numbers, which gives them a lot of power and strength. These news articles clearly show how difficult it is to create religious harmony in Indian society, as long as these narrow-minded elements from all religions are present in society this task is going to be very challenging. I already wrote about the "secular and communal trap" that most political parties use to fool their voters and hide their own failures and corruption. Equal blame is on all voters and citizens who allow these parties and religious institutions to exploit them. These institutes are thousands of years old and their effect is very strong on the human psyche.

When the administration starts thinking about whether to implement a law just because of fear of hurting the religious sentiments then definitely there is a problem. According to me this can happen only because of two reasons, either the administration is not strong enough or courageous enough to act against these anti-social elements or they are only interested in playing politics of appeasement, the politics of divide and rule. This policy of divide and rule is used by various rulers to control their masses because they know that if the masses unite they will discover the truth and then it's not good for them.

I think it's up to us to decide how long we are going to allow them to divide us and exploit us. There will be always people who fall prey to these divisive politics but we need to try our best to make more and more people aware of this trap. Only voters can make these politicians realize that this divisive politics won't work anymore and they should do the work that they are supposed to do. We need to change ourselves first then only politicians will be forced to change, let's hope every one of us contributes their share to bringing that change.

Thanks for reading and please share your views on this topic.

(Copyright: Vinay Thakur. Please contact the author for re-posting or publishing)

Links:
1. Shivaji Maharaj statue removed from the entrance gate of FACT museum
2. U.P. IAS officers, Opposition slam Nagpal’s suspension
3. Furious IAS officers protest against Durga Shakti Nagpal's suspension